• What are Property Encumbrances?

• What is a Caution?

• What is a Caveat?

• What is a Restriction?

• Main differences between Caveats, Cautions, and Restrictions?

Property encumbrances are any claims, liens, or liabilities attached to property that can limit its use, transfer, or even have a direct impact on its value. Encumbrances affect the property owner’s ability to fully enjoy or freely dispose of the property.

For example, a beneficiary with a  legitimate grievance on the distribution of their benefactor’s property (for example the child of a deceased person who stands to gain an inheritance of their deceased parent), can apply for the placement of a restriction on a property to dispute that distribution to other beneficiaries until such time as their grievance is heard and determined. 

Property Encumbrances broadly fall into two main categories:

• Financial Encumbrances: These include liens and mortgages, where a financial claim is placed on the property, often due to a debt owed by the property owner.
• Non-Financial Encumbrances: These include easements, restrictions, caveats, and cautions, which limit how the property can be used or transferred without necessarily involving a financial obligation.

In Kenya, cautions, caveats and restrictions are all legal tools used to either notify the public at large of the property rights of individuals or entities other than the property owner and to protect property rights and prevent unauthorized dealings in property.

Strictly speaking, cautions cannot “technically” be classified as a form of encumbrance since they do not compel or absolutely deter dealings in the property except for calling to attention the right of existing third-party rights.

They however serve different purposes and are initiated under different circumstances. It is important to understand their purpose(s) and how they differ:

What is a Caution:

A caution is a notice on a property title indicating a third party’s interest in a property and serves the purpose of warning, or alerting any prospective buyers or stakeholders of an existing claim or dispute around the property. It notifies anyone intending to deal with the land of the cautioner’s interest, typically urging further inquiry or caution in transactions involving the property.

In terms of being an encumbrance, a caution merely serves the purpose of notifying or warning interested parties that a third party claims an interest in the property – it does not prevent any dealings in the property. A husband or wife going through a divorce, for example, may place a caution on their matrimonial property registered in the other’s name to deter them from engaging in dishonest dealings in the property, or dealings that favour one over the other without the approval of both. It wouldn’t stop, for example, a potential purchasor from acquiring the property. However, the buyer would be notified of the claim by the spouse whose name isn’t on the title records.

A caution may be lodged by anyone who has a “cautionable” interest in the land, which can be less substantial than ownership, such as a leaseholder, a person with a contractual right, or someone with a prospective interest. The threshold for lodging a caution is lower than that of a caveat.

What is a Caveat:

A caveat is a legal notice filed by a party claiming an interest in a property, which serves to prevent any transactions on that property without their knowledge. It essentially signals a warning that someone else has an interest in the property and seeks to protect that interest.

As an encumbrance, a caveat serves the purpose of restricting the owner’s ability to freely sell, transfer, or mortgage the property. When a caveat is registered, it effectively freezes any further transactions on the property unless the caveator (person lodging the caveat) consents or a court orders its removal.

To lodge a caveat, one must have a recognized legal or equitable interest strong enough to justify halting any transactions. This interest could include an unregistered owner, mortgagee, or any person with a vested interest in safeguarding their rights over the property. Caveats are therefore more substantial and assertive in establishing a right than Cautions, as they directly bar any further dealings.

What is a Restriction:

A restriction is typically imposed by a court, public authority, or other official entity in order to regulate or limit certain dealings on the property and is often used by authorities or officials to enforce compliance with legal or regulatory requirements.

A restriction is often imposed to ensure that certain conditions are met before any property transactions can take place. Restrictions have the effect, as an encumbrance, of limiting how the property can be used, sold, or mortgaged. The owner must comply with the specified conditions before making any changes to the property status.

The main differences between Caveats, Cautions, and Restrictions

Examples of Situations Where Restrictions May Be Used

If a public official is under investigation by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Authority (EACC) under suspicion of acquiring property(ies) using the proceeds of corruption, then the Authority can request the investigating body to restrict the subject property(ies) suspected to have been acquired using such proceeds.

The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) would in turn forward the request to the Registrar of Lands to place a restriction on the property until such time as the matter under investigation (or for that matter before the court) has been heard and determined.

This restriction would only be lifted on acquittal of the public official. Alternatively, if found guilty, then the property(ies) would be confiscated by the agency responsible for the recovery of proceeds of corruption, usually the EACC.

Another example of when authorities may place a restriction would be when private land has been reclaimed for public utilities, such as roads, and there is an intervening period where an unsuspecting buyer may make an offer to buy a property that the Government has already earmarked for compensation to the owner.

The restriction would ensure that an unsuspecting buyer doesn’t get duped into paying for a property that the Government has already compulsorily acquired or compensated a “would-be seller”.

Conclusion

Cautions, caveats, and restrictions serve as essential tools for balancing ownership rights with third-party interests and legal compliance in property management.

While property owners have the right to control and dispose of their assets, encumbrances ensure that any claims, unresolved interests, or regulatory requirements are respected, thereby protecting all parties involved. For prospective buyers, lenders, and stakeholders, understanding these mechanisms is crucial for informed and secure dealings.

Ultimately, cautions, caveats, and restrictions uphold fairness and transparency in property transactions, reinforcing a legal framework where individual rights and public interests coexist harmoniously.